VP Welfare Adam McGibbon and MLA Anna Lo have spoken out about the latest alleged sex attack in the University area. Police are investigating an alleged rape which took place on Saturday morning. It was reported that a woman was viciously attacked by two men in an alleyway between Cromwell Road and Ireton Street between 12:30am and 1:30am. PSNI are currently appealing to anyone who was in the area at the time to come forward.

BY KERRI-ANNE CAMPBELL

Anna Lo has urged women to be extra vigilant when going home at night in the university area, and has also called for PSNI to step up patrols at night.

She also stressed that the area is currently very quiet as most students have left for the summer holidays and this could make young women even more vulnerable to attack.

Sexual assault in the university area of South Belfast has been a continuing issue. VP Welfare and chairperson of the South Belfast Green Party, Adam McGibbon said, “It is a big concern. The university area is becoming more and more of a dangerous place.”

McGibbon stated that he is currently planning a number of campaigns in order to combat the problem and is hoping to work alongside Belfast City Council. As part of the campaign, it is hoped that in the near future, students will be able to use their student card in order to pay their taxi fee at a later date if they do not have the money at the time. If the campaign is successful, this would certainly ensure that every student has a safe way of getting home. McGibbon also encourages students to use the personal safety alarms which are available in the Students’ Union.

According to the Belfast Telegraph, last year 1,943 incidents of sexual assault were reported to the PSNI, of which 381 were alleged rapes. However, a report published earlier this month has revealed that only one in fifteen alleged rapes reported in Northern Ireland ends with a criminal conviction. As a result of this many rape victims refuse to report to the police.

BY LAUARA SHEARER

Unsurprisingly we are given the option of watching in 3D format, the same audience dazzling gimmick that passed mass audiences by during the fifties and again in the eighties. Speaking out about why they’ve used this format to their advantage, Pixar have stated that they wanted to offer fans something completely new in 3D. Instead of just giving off the normal spectacle tricks of things appearing to come out of the screen before your eyes, they have developed a style that perfectly suits Pixar. One of the first films enjoyable in 3D, it’s possible to be immersed in the scenery with the characters as the plot commences. To keep young viewers focused there are those moments of eye-popping props, but overall the feel is much more sophisticated.

Toy Story 3 is a lot more themed towards older viewers, perhaps eager parents, or film buffs that grew up with Woody and Buzz, with hugely admirable genre referencing. Touching on the darker tones of film noir, gang crime and jailbreak, as always these are used cleverly and bulked out with quick gags and a sharp wit that keeps the mood light. Definitely there for the more mature viewers is the Barbie meets Ken subplot, hugely entertaining and it plays wonderfully on all the stereotypes we expect.

It is difficult to stretch a critical eye far enough to find flaws with any Pixar film and this is no exception. Like any decent sequel should do, it re-ignites all the joys of the original, suitably adds to the enjoyment and somehow makes it even more impressive. Take the whole family, go with your friends and then go once more for sheer indulgence.

BY CHRIS JOHNSON

Folk rock heroes Mumford and Sons make a highly anticipated return to Belfast to open up the first evening of this year’s Open House Festival. Still riding high on the waves created from their critically acclaimed debut album ‘Sigh No More’, tickets sold out within 36 hours of their release. Support will be provided by Lissie, and Andrew Davie.

White Lies have provided support for an impressive number of A-List acts such as Kings of Leon, Coldplay and Snow Patrol, but Tuesday 7^th will see them take centre stage at the Marquee. Coming equipped with piercing guitar, grandiose synth and an impressive post-punk clout, the award winning London 3-piece is the volatile firecracker of this year’s Open House line up. Support will come from local band Panama Kings.

After providing support for Mumford and Sons, Lissie will headline her own evening in the Black Box on Wednesday 8th. Meanwhile, gothic-Americana troubadour Sam Beam, better known as Iron & Wine, will be bringing his unique pastoral folk sound to the Festival Marquee in Custom House Square, with support from Nathaniel Rateliff, and The Low Anthem.

Indie giants Modest Mouse arrive back in Belfast on Thursday 9^th. Frequently lauded with praise throughout their career, the band reached new heights when former guitarist of The Smiths, Johnny Marr, joined the ranks from 2006 to 2009. Front man Isaac Brock recently revealed the band is beginning work on their new album. Support comes in the form of Morgan O’Kane &Ferd4, and local darlings Kowalski, who recently released their impressive EP, ‘Take Care Take Flight’. 

Conor O’Brien’s appearance at the Open House Festival on Thursday 9^th will mark his Belfast debut. Sophisticated folk rockers Moulettes will provide support.

In McHugh’s Basement bar on Friday 10^th, Denver based singer songwriter Nathaniel Rateliff makes his debut headline show in Belfast with support coming from local folkie Captain Cameron, and newcomers Matrimony.

Meanwhile, in the Marquee, the Elder Statesmen of Alternative folk, Wilco, will be geared up to set the stage alight, with their unmistakable brand of star-gazing county folk. The band are set to return to the studio later this month to record their new album, so who knows what kind of surprises they will have in store come September. Field Music and The Felice Brothers will open up the evening’s proceedings.

All hail to the Americana gig of the year. The Dave Rawlings Machine, fronted by long-time musical partner of Americana singer songwriter Gillian Welch, play an exclusive Irish debut at this year’s Open House Festival in Belfast on Saturday 11^th September. Sharing the stage will be musical compadres Old Crow Medicine Show, creating the perfect union of “old-time string music and punk swagger.”

Everyone’s favourite crooning carnie, Seasick Steve, comes freewheeling into Belfast to close this year’s Open House Festival. Since his rise to public recognition, he has been rubbing shoulders with the likes of Jools Holland and made an appearance on the Pyramid Stage at this year’s Glastonbury. So grab your moonshine, don your dungarees and prepare yourself for a terrific toe-tapping finale.

Don’t miss this year’s Chillifest, where you can expect to find the finest in American music (including Hayseed Dixie on Sunday afternoon), record fair, cupcake corner, barn dancing, helium karaoke, and of course, some red hot chilli. It’s a great family day out, so get your tickets while they’re hot.  Be sure to check out some of the extraordinary Irish Tradition Music evenings in The John Hewitt Bar and The Black Box.

For more information, visit www.openhousefestival.com or call the Box Office on 028 9024 6609.

BY LAURA SHEARER

www.queensfilmtheatre.com

Instantaneously exciting, we are enveloped in his world, starting in World War II Paris as a young boy in a Russian Jewish home.  Everything he does and sees is bounding with bold life and colour, giving us intimate glimpses of an imaginary world into which he reverts for entertainment and the salvation of his sanity during the Nazi occupation.  Young Lucien Ginsburg (Serge Gainsbourg is his stage name) takes with him a giant-headed figure of the terrifying Jew from a Nazi propaganda billboard poster, something which at first he fears, but realising it looks very similar to his own reflection it becomes a companion.  Brash and proud to wear his Star of David, it’s evident from the first few minutes that this young boy has the eccentric potential of the future artistic legend.

Famed for his womanising ways, Gainsbourg’s daring and ability to charm begins in the Montmartre Art Academy where he sneaks glances at female life models.  He progresses to the insatiable and suave genius, able to tweak his talents from painting to song writing as each beautiful woman desires.  Laetitia Castas is marvellous as Brigitte Bardot, acting with such enjoyment that she seems to emphasise all the fantasies her presence gives way to.  Anna Mouglalis takes the role of Juliette Greco and the late Lucy Gordon stars as Jane Birkin, both dazzling actresses that have their own very unique sultry charms in these powerful roles.

From his early watercolour comics doodled late at night he creates a fairytale creature version of himself, who becomes his partner in crime and devil on his shoulder for the rest of his life.  Magically depicted by obscure puppets, his alter-ego gets the luxurious treatment of Doug Jones, who played the fawn in Guillermo del Toro’s Pan’s Labyrinth.  In a way Gainsbourg becomes the literal embodiment of the French artist stereotype as he smokes constantly, tires easily, is very melodramatic, and is barely ever satisfied with himself.

Joann Sfar states that he didn’t want to make a realist, journalistic account of Gainsbourg’s life; he wanted to make a cult film.  Sfar’s background is of telling stories through images, so it’s only natural that his film is so visual, but this is what makes it such a huge success and accomplishment.  Production designer Christian Martí was directed to study Russian paintings and films such as Murnau’s Nosferatu, Carné’s Les Enfants and Fellini’s Amarcord for points of reference.  It’s a distinctive style that has been created on screen, but an easily subtle one that makes good references to expressionism.

Everything that makes you fall head over heels in love with Paris is sumptuously exposed before your eyes with an appealing allure unlike that found in any other city and in few other films.  The lighting is mood driven, with jazz clubs temptingly dim and always filled with the eccentric and beautiful people Paris is all too well known for.  The whole film is full of characters that embody art in what they do and in their image, a truly fascinating array that Gainsbourg fits into eloquently.  It’s just such a pleasure to watch from start to finish and I can’t see this project in the hands of anyone else. Joann Sfar has done justice to the man that so many claim inspiration from.

BY LAURA SHEARER

Sadly, swearing doesn’t compensate for the lack of dialogue strength. The plot is very basic and thinly spread out over the run time. There’s very little to think about. Any evidence to the narrative mysteries is laid bare with a mere scene or two in between explanations from the characters. Any topical thought process is quickly pushed to the side, as the Arnie replacement figure points out “it’s not important why we’re here, it’s how we get out.”

There are a few moments that encourage viewers to think that the group might stand a fair chance of survival. Their past knowledge of warfare and their revealing brutality sparks the suspicion that there may be more than just the usual single survivor. Surely with such a simple plot line this idea cannot stretch very far?

The ethnic stereotyping makes a bold 1950’s Hollywood statement, which honestly has no positive impact on the film. For fans of martial arts films, the Asian samurai warrior fight scene is a key example of this stereotyping, but highly enjoyable as a new take on the defeat of the predator character.

The homage to the original is very enjoyable and the geeky additions of other aliens, a new planet and some new predator figures really set this sequel apart from the rest. Arnie’s original is still much loved and will always have a place in many people’s filmic hearts, so it’s difficult to assume that this was a necessary production.

Predators is definitely a crowd drawer, and surely a crowd pleaser at that, but lacks the substance of the original. If you’re just looking for a nice slice of cheese to while away an afternoon, then this space romp is sure to do the job.

BY MATTHEW MCKERNAN

McBride’s film is a modern look at the outlaw, casting the old American myth in a new light, and it’s  just as rewarding as Robert Altman’s early work. Richard Gere plays the outlaw as a hipster in an interesting performance. However, coming as it does before Quentin Tarantino made his mark on cinema, it can’t help but feel anachronistic. It’s a performance that some may find tiresome, but who is really that taken by Belmondo’s cool but post-human lead performance in Godard’s 1959 original? Instead, Gere tears through every scene as his character tears through life.

While the original invites audiences to consider how much they depend on conventional film making codes and techniques, McBride questions issues that affect real life, such as, “How much would you be willing to throw away in order to live?” Gere’s hoodlum demands that the shackles of education and employment are tossed aside and forgotten. Valerie Kaprisky’s character, the object of Gere’s demands, is an aspiring architect. Why design buildings to last when, as one character states, nothing can. Gere’s car door is open and love beckons, so what will Kaprisky choose? Her inability to take the jump brings her back to the prison of a secure job.

The remake may be devoid of the infamous jump cuts and it may conventionally frame a scene, but it is not without its artistic touches. In what other Hollywood thriller would you see a big star strip naked while singing along to ‘Suspicious Minds’, which only he can hear, before jumping into Kaprisky’s shower for sex? And what about the red-tinted car sequences where the background is as fake and intangible as the ties that keep people stuck in dead-end jobs? And, without giving too much away, McBride’s ending is much more stylish, much more romantic and much more interesting than Godard’s bit of Gallic mistranslation.

The argument as to which version of Breathless is better will rage on. Stereotypically, the arty film fans will prefer Godard’s original and those who prefer non-challenging Hollywood movies will prefer the remake (if not dislike both). Both films are rewarding but completely different and cannot be compared; McBride’s film is about personal choices while Godard’s is about cinematic revolution. However, the latter has as much relevance to real life as remembering bin day.

BY BEN FINCH
In the Ardoyne area, a policewoman was injured when a block of masonry was thrown from the roof of a shop onto her head. Three officers were shot in the area and petrol and blast bombs were thrown at police. Over eighty officers were injured in the riots and millions of pounds worth of damage done to buildings in the community.

Father Gary Donegan of Holy Cross Church on the Crumlin Road has described the violence as “recreational rioting” and likened it to a theme park due to the age of many involved. It has been claimed that there were some rioters as young as eight years old involved in the disturbances.

So far, most attention has focused on the violence and consequences of the trouble. Very little has been paid to the underlying cause. If at all, it has been decried as dissident republicans hoping to scupper the peace process. Without making excuses for any of those taking part in the riots, if the Orange Order had been told they were not to pass through such areas as the Ardoyne by the Parades Commission, chances are that the high level of violence witnessed would not have happened. For years Orange parades have caused widespread rioting by both sides of the community, often in areas not directly affected by the marching. In any other part of the UK marches such as this would be treated as incitement to religious violence.

Plenty of comments made by students, over Facebook or otherwise, have been made along the lines of “If rioters want to throw petrol bombs and fire a few rounds of a shotgun at the police then the police should be allowed to fire a few rounds or a few petrol bombs back. See if they like it…Get off the streets, stop sponging off the government you don’t even recognise and get a job”. Again, this simply focuses on the effects, ignoring the current difficulty of finding and maintaining work, especially for those brought up in under-privileged areas, where young people are less likely to engage in education, thus seriously reducing their chances of gaining qualifications. A lack of engagement with education does not reflect a lack of desire to work. Also, similar comments do not take into consideration the fact that similar acts of violence and the blatant entrenchment of views were among the major reasons why Northern Ireland needed a peace process in the first place.

Comments such as these may represent a large part of the unionist community in Northern Ireland, but not everyone feels the same way. I have been speaking to students who have said that if the protests were peaceful then they’d join them, and others who have called for the outright banning of the Orange Order. These people did not want to be named. This is the crux of the matter. While the violence may be organised by dissident republicans taking advantage of ill-informed youths, the opportunity was handed to them by the Orange Order marching through areas where, as they very well know, they are not at all welcome.

Trouble also occurred in other areas during the twelfth; cars were set alight in Armagh, in Lurgan the Dublin-bound Enterprise suffered an attempted hijack and police officers were attacked in the Bogside area of Derry. All such incidents occurred in specific areas where parades did not take place. Such acts of violence can only be tenuously linked to the marches and should be condemned as Orange Lodges in these areas respectfully diverted their parades away from hostile areas. This approach needs to be followed in the few places where twelfth celebrations are still contentious.

It is constantly hammered into those studying medicine to treat the underlying cause of an illness rather than the symptoms, otherwise the treatment has no effect. Civil disobedience and uncivil disruption happens for a reason, not for the sake of it. Now that the disturbances have ended and a relatively stable situation has at last developed in the Ardoyne area, rather than concentrating solely on the violence, the cause of the riots needs to be examined and dealt with by both sides.

BY EMMA GALLEN

This proposal is likely to soothe tensions within Cable’s party over the looming threat of higher fees, especially after the last autumn’s Browne review. The Liberal Democrats pledged to phase out the fees system in their election manifesto, but have been accused of betraying students (and their many student voters) after abandoning this position in the coalition agreement.

While the student unions are broadly receptive to Cable’s proposal, student support is not universal. Many see a lifelong tax to be more unfair than fees; others may see university as an investment, with higher debt at a prestigious university worth the risk for a better potential career.

QUBSU VP Welfare Adam McGibbon thinks this mindset values university for the wrong reasons. “University is about learning about life and meeting people as well as gaining a qualification.” For McGibbon, Cable’s other proposals regarding university disregard some of the major benefits of campus life. The VP’s view is that encouraging more students to stay at home to study overlooks the importance of gaining independence.

Cable also dismisses classes with low contact time, claiming that there is “no need for seven hour weeks” and arguing they could be taught in two years instead of three. This proposal undermines the value of most Arts degrees where class time is minimal in order to allow more time for student reading and staff research.

VP Education Nathan Anderson stressed that students must be cautious in their readings of Cable’s proposal, highlighting that the majority of Cable’s cabinet are ideologically opposed to a “tax on the affluent.” He was also keen to make it known that Queen’s will not necessarily be affected by Cable’s proposals as Northern Ireland regulates its own universities and are have to carry out their own review.  However, he does warn that the Browne review will set a precedent that Northern Ireland’s Department of Education and Learning will follow.

NUS-USI Deputy President Lorcan Mullen thinks that the proposals are an overall positive:

“While this is only a proposal, and a proposal facing likely opposition from the vice-chancellors and senior Tories (including ministers in Cable’s department), it is encouraging news. It is my firm view that any settlement that makes education free at the point of access, and brings proportionate post-degree contributions will be fairer.

Of course, the various student unions will make a proper assessment of Cable’s plans when more details are available. However, this should not distract students from the dangers of a zealously pro-market, pro-cuts government seeking to concurrently slash spending in our system.”

It’s official, Guns N’ Roses are lined up to play their first ever Belfast gig. Formed in 1985, Guns N’ Roses became one of the defining rock acts of the late 20th Century, selling over 100 million albums worldwide. However, tensions within the band would see the original line-up slowly crumble away, and by 1997 vocalist Axl Rose was the sole remaining original member. Despite this, Guns N’ Roses soldiered on with a new line-up and in 2008 made their comeback with the highly anticipated album

BY ANDREW SCOTT

Guns N’ Roses’ debut in Belfast marks a trend of popular rock/metal acts playing the city. 2010 has already seen Metallica perform in Northern Ireland for the first time since 1988, and Deep Purple’s first ever Northern Irish show. Bumblefoot was surprised to hear that Northern Ireland has often received the short straw when it comes to gigs. “My question is, why hasn’t it happened sooner? I have no idea why, I’m just glad it changed. I’m glad GNR and all these other bands are coming to Belfast now.” And as a music fanatic, he had a few kind words for some of Northern Ireland’s hottest emerging talent, “‘The Continuous Battle Of Order’ is cool, a real head trip! ‘Not Squares’ can get pretty ‘out there’. Then we have ‘Putrefy’ – sick fucking vocals! (laughs) Yeah, ‘The Answer’ are real good, great singing, and a real nice feeling ya get from their songs.”

When asked what role he felt music could play in times of conflict and transformation, highlighting the success of The Undertones and Stiff Little Fingers during The Troubles, Bumblefoot said, “Music can be a strong voice in tough times. Whether it’s a voice of tolerance or to heat up the fight; it unifies people, fuels the fire, whatever your fire is. It can also be an escape from all that, to take you away from what’s weighing you down.”

Bumblefoot is looking forward to checking out the sights in Belfast, if G’N'R’s busy touring schedule allows for it. “I would love to check out the Waterfront, maybe go see Belfast Castle as well. My favourite thing is the real stuff, finding random local places, eat what y’all eat, drink what you drink, hang out and get a better sense of how life is.” Bumblefoot is refreshingly frank about life on the road, explaining “My favourite touring experiences are usually the ‘normal’ moments, when you’re with calm people having a nice conversation and you’re not getting bombarded. Then there’s the opposite extreme, and I won’t get into details of that! (laughs) I’ve had some great times in Russia, Japan, Latin America, and the UK as well. Whether it’s naked table hockey or a relaxing cup of tea, it’s the people you’re with that make the moment great.”

Concerning the Chinese Democracy album, Bumblefoot confirmed that fans in Belfast can expect some of the album’s finest tracks to be played live, including the thunderous title track, the hook-laden ‘Better’ and piano-ballad ‘Street Of Dreams’. It is abundantly clear that Bumblefoot loves to perform live. “Ya know what I’d love to do? Write a song every time we do a leg of a tour, record it, make it available to people, play it at the shows, and do that every time. Ya never know which one will really have a big impact on people.” However, fans looking forward to the next Guns N’ Roses album may be waiting a while longer. Bumblefoot admits he would love to make new music next, “but we will have to see what the future holds. For now I’m just looking at the immediate future, coming to Europe, coming to Belfast.”

While plenty of classic Guns N’ Roses material is played live, Bumblefoot does not feel that additional material will be taken from the band’s more experimental Use Your Illusion albums, released in 1991. “I’ll play any of ‘em, but right now it doesn’t look like we’re adding any more ‘Illusions’ songs to the set. Anything could change at any time, but that’s how it’s looking’ right now… I do sneak in a little piece of ‘Estranged’ during my solo.”

Of course, Guns N’ Roses are synonymous with Axl Rose, the band’s enigmatic vocalist and frontman. Chinese Democracy was worked on for a decade at an estimated cost of over $13 million, making it the most expensive album ever made. Rose has often been negatively portrayed by the media, accusing him of ruthless perfectionism and claiming the singer responsible for the break-up of the original line-up. Bumblefoot, however, insists that Axl does not deserve such a reputation, adding, “We’ve had plenty of fun times, some tough times in the trenches, but it’s all good.”

Aspiring guitarists need look no further than Bumblefoot for inspiration on how to reach the top of the rock n’ roll ladder. ”The first song I learned was a riff in ‘Rock And Roll Hoochie Koo’ from Rick Derringer. The riff before the first verse, and after each chorus. That was back in ’77, I was 7 years old. After that I think it was ‘Barracuda’ from Heart that I learned next, the intro riff. I got the sheet music for it, and man I had such a crush on the Wilson sisters. I was 8, they were sisters – perfect. Okay, it may not have worked out…I was big into the Beatles, KISS, AC/DC, Yes, Sex Pistols, Ramones as a kid, then got into Zep, Floyd, Who, Queen, Rush, Priest, then a lot of old-school metal.”

Famed for his unusual guitar designs, including his famous ‘foot’ guitar, Bumblefoot revealed that even his first guitar has received a unique makeover. “It’s gone through a few changes. I used to do a lot of guitar re-building as a teenager.”

It is apparent that Bumblefoot is a true rock star and a technical guitar maestro who is sure to give his all when Guns N’ Roses, once dubbed the world’s most dangerous band, perform in Belfast’s Odyssey arena in August.

The Manfred Mann song came to mind as I went down past the Lanyon Building one day last week at lunchtime on an errand. The hundreds of graduands, and wives and girlfriends thereof, stalking across the lawns and pavements in their 10 centimetre heels (I’m a bit of SI unit man myself) in their multicoloured best – while the men marched around awkwardly in the suits they hope will impress at those first interviews.

BY THE AULD WAN

It was such a contrast to my own graduation day when those who wished to attend were issued with a dress code -  dark suits and collar and tie for men, white blouses and black skirts for the ladies. Non-conformists would not be admitted. I bent the code as far as I dared without knocking a hole in the family’s day out and wore a lilac shirt under a mid-grey bird’s eye check three piece. Seemed trendy at the time – now just looks naff in the few photos that were taken with my camera. I didn’t bother with the studio rip-off version.

Another change today is the absence of ‘the national anthem’ at the start – for good reasons I believe, not least because it begs the question of ‘Which nation?’ In my case it saved my bacon as I overslept and was running down the Malone Road throwing on my gown at 10.57. A tolerant member of the admin staff whom I knew let me slip quickly into my seat while everyone was on their feet for what must be the worst musical dirge of any civilised country. (Think Marseillaise and Nkosi Sikelele Africa for contrast).

On Thursday of graduation week – the last day for which I have figures – 938 people were conferred with their degrees and other awards; 47 of them didn’t come. For reasons that I can’t fathom three quarters of the absentees were nursing and midwifery graduands and nobody from St Mary’s University College missed out.

About a third of my graduation class didn’t bother – the aforesaid dress code being too much for the hippie generation to which I belong. Much has been made recently in the pages (screens?) of The Gown about the proposed graduation charge of £55 and the impact that it will have on attendance. I’m betting it will pale into near invisibility against the cost of the Jimmy Choos and the Coast dresses – and the men will just do what they are told, as always.

Come on you flamingos!

Seamus Heaney officially opened the McClay Library on Tuesday 6^th July during a black tie ceremony attended by various dignitaries associated with Queen’s University. The new library has been named after late benefactor Sir Allen McClay, and has been described by Lady McClay as an appropriate way to remember Sir Allen. In December 2009, The Gown reported on QUB’s failure to notify Heaney that the library in his name was no longer open.

BY BEN FINCH

“This is a beautiful place which is bound to give people a sense of self-worth that will enhance them,” Heaney said before the ceremony. In a speech full of his usual pastoral metaphors, he also described it as a “star-ship for our scholars” when discussing the IT facilities.
Peter Gregson said it was a historic night for Queen’s and for the students, current and future, who shall benefit. In his speech he said that it had been fifty years since Seamus Heaney had graduated from Queen’s University. However, Heaney contradicted this, subtly pointing out that he graduated in 1961.

The ceremony was purposely set to coincide with the graduations. The McClay Library has already been open for a year, and John Gormley of the Information Services Directorate Office said that they “had been keen to open the library as soon as possible so students can use it and I would like to think it has played a part in some of these graduations”.

He added, “We have been very lucky indeed. If we had started any later then it may not have been possible due to economic conditions. We are indebted to Allen McClay who has been very generous.”

A new wall has been constructed beside the Short Loan Section of the library which names the benefactors who contributed to the building. Gormley also said that there is always a danger of overlooking people such as Anthony O’Reilly, whose name is prominently placed on the wall. The library was originally to be named ‘The Sir Anthony O’Reilly Library’ .

Speaking to The Gown earlier this year, Norma Sinte, Director of Development and Alumni Relations, said that there is now a protocol in place regarding the naming of buildings, and all universities adhere to this. Under this protocol, a building can only be named after a benefactor. A building cannot be named after a VIP, academic, vice chancellor or alumnus who hasn’t donated money.

Edna and Michael Longley were in attendance at the ceremony. Edna Longley is a member of staff in the Seamus Heaney Centre and is currently working on a book on Yeats, so often uses special collections. “It is a pleasant and excellent centre to work in,” she said. While Michael Longley, Ireland Professor of Poetry, described libraries as “the most wonderful places in the world”.

Few students were at the black tie event. Among those enjoying a glass of wine were the new sabbatical officers of the Students’ Union. “The library is a remarkable opportunity for students but if students have any problems with Information Services they should contact the Union,” said new SU President Gareth McGreevy. He also commented on the poignancy of having an alumnus in Seamus Heaney opening the McClay Library.

On 22^nd June, QUB Vice Chancellor Peter Gregson provided a brief summary to Senate on the Russell Group submission to the Browne Review. However, Shane Brogan, Students’ Union President at the time, believes that the summary failed to adequately describe what their proposals would mean for students.

BY KERRI-ANNE CAMPBELL

Due to the recent emergency budget, it is inevitable that there will be substantial reductions in university funding from government sources. Shane Brogan stated that Queen’s Students’ Union understands this but he believes the report to be a “systematic attempt to remove the shallow façade of fairness in the current fees system”.

If implemented, the report would see graduates being forced to pay back student loans earlier, the removal of any form of government support for student loans, and students bearing most of the costs of their degree, which the Russell Group set at being between £7,000 and £14,000 depending on the subject.

It would also mean that the protection of the ability to access higher education would be eroded through the abolition of the cap on fees, allowing the most elite and highest quality universities to charge unprecedented fees that put them beyond the reach of many students. This would mean that Queen’s would become like the Ivy League Universities of America.

The report also proposes a number of unfair models to finance student debt involving the Private Sector, many of which transfer substantial risks to students, and again reduce fairness and equality within the higher education sector.

“The proposals are a complete abdication of a university’s responsibility to work in the best interests of its students, and are blatant attempts to channel government money that currently support the poorest and most disadvantaged students, away from them and into university funds,”said Brogan.

He raised a number of comments relating to student fees during Gregson’s report. The university and Russell Group propose a model that is “free at the point of entry”, and where this is technically true in terms of fees, it fails to acknowledge the hidden costs that the university applies throughout a degree.

According to Brogan, the report also failed to address the fact that the average student who started at a NI university in September 2008-2009 can expect to graduate with an average debt of £13,299, a 30% increase on the previous year. This figure is predicted to be more than £15,000 by the time QUB students who started in September 2009 have graduated.

To help pay for the substantial cost of higher education, students in Belfast have one of the highest part-time employment rates during term time of any UK university town.

Russell Group is currently lobbying for a move away from the cap on fees, while at the same time acknowledging the fact that an increase in student fees would inevitably make students reconsider enrolling in university. The Vice Chancellor’s report quotes the initial findings of the Browne Review, which found that students are often deterred by fees.

Vice Chancellor Gregson claimed that a substantial portion of the population supports those that currently benefit from Higher Education and are responsible for contributing. This is recognised by those involved in higher education. However, over the past year all parties, bar that of the relevant minister, have refused to endorse an increase in fees, with both Sinn Fein and SDLP actively committed to their removal.

Brogan said, “The Student’s Union is disappointed that the Report has failed to acknowledge the only fully evaluated proposal put forward to the review by the National Union of Students. The National Union of Students propose a progressive and fairer way of funding student and graduate contributions and protects students from grossly unfair and inevitable debts, by providing a tax on graduates, meaning that the students who benefit most from Higher Education and good quality teaching contribute more over their career. It also proposes a fairer system of students support and ensures that all income streams are fully exploited.”

Brogan went on to say, “It is in no uncertain terms that the proposals of the Russell Group are strongly rejected by the SU and the wider student body at Queen’s, with a record 1,242 voting in a referendum on the issue on 27 May. 1,193, or 96% of them voted against the proposal.”

BY LAURA SHEARER

Curb Your Enthusiasm star Larry Davids is a huge let down, despite being given an undemanding role. Davids plays the same self-centred, easily annoyed old man role that has become monotonous within Allen’s films. At least with Vicky Cristina Barcelona Allen pushed himself away from this style of characterisation. Allen’s comic scripting ability is lost when the characters speak directly to the audience. By staring down the camera lens and seemingly straight at the viewer, Boris attempts to engage our interests in his miserable view on life. The rate at which he rabbits on incessantly about himself and his ideas quashes any form of response to his horrible comments. It is clear that this is Allen’s form of dark comedy, simply meant to be passively forgiven. What happened to Allen’s much loved and hilarious nonsensical situations and blathering? This is too dull to pass off as the same directing capability.

In an attempt to relive his glory days Allen rehashes his cinematic love of Manhattan. However, instead of showing lots of superbly desirable landscape shots, we are quickly whisked into the path of Boris again. Allen’s involvement with the city is fair, but he has opted for a bohemian approach. He appears to mock New York with the southern belle come photographer/artiste/mother-in-law, who undergoes an abrupt change in lifestyle after encountering the bustling city. This seems to be a bid to depict Allen’s own infatuation with New York City, but if so, he mocks himself and not in a way he would like.

The typical love affair impulse features in Boris’s affair with young runaway, Melody. This gives the film a sense of romantic idealism and confers new meaning to the film’s title. However, the main romanticism does not centre on Boris, completely isolating him from what becomes the key impulse of the film, even though it is presenting his theory on life. Ultimately, this begs the question of why Boris is our protagonist, a man of such ritual that the compassion of love is irregular to him.

If Allen had set out at the beginning that Whatever Works is a series of love filled tales, with Boris simply narrating and explaining his theory, then it would have made perfect sense. Instead, the film fails to show Boris’ theory working on a practical level, and the central idea of the film is lost by the finishing speech. Larry Davids fans might be disappointed by Whatever Works, but Woody Allen fans will feel robbed.

As students graduate from QUB this week, a dark cloud has emerged above them as The Guardian reported today that graduates will be up against an average of 70 other applicants for any job they go for. Not only will they be up against the class of 2010, but they will also face opposition from graduates of 2009 who are still seeking to land that dream job. This is all made even worse by the fact that vacancies are set to fall by 7%, with 78% of employers are insisting on a 2.1 degree.

BY EMMA GALLEN

Summer graduation at Queen’s takes place this week, with up to three ceremonies per day.  Monday’s opening graduation ceremony was held for the students of the Schools of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences and the week’s events will end with the graduation of those belonging to the School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering and the School of Planning, Architecture and Civil Engineering.

Despite the gloomy economic outlook graduates will continue to celebrate their success. Looking towards summer graduation, History and Politics student Roisin Murray said, “I’m quite excited and it’s nice to feel that I’ve achieved something.”

Each of this year’s summer graduation events are to be streamed live on the Queen’s University website, inviting relatives and friends of graduates to take part in “a treasured moment”. Full recordings of all the ceremonies will also be available online afterwards, as well as photographs taken throughout the week.

Those receiving honorary doctorates this term Jamaican Olympic gold medallist Usain Bolt. Former police ombudsman Baroness Nuala O’Loan will receive an LLD for distinction in public service and Dame Kelly Holmes for distinction in sport and public services.

Recalling last year’s events, Queen’s summer 2009 graduate Laura Gray explained that the most overwhelming feeling of the day was relief. “After three years work, I was now a graduate”, she said. However, for many of last year’s graduates the sense of relief soon gave way to anxiety as Laura and her peers found themselves in a declining job market with scarce opportunities.

According to The Guardian, “The class of 2010 have been told to consider flipping burgers or stacking shelves when they leave university as leading firms in investment banking, law and IT are due to cut graduate jobs this year.”

Former Gown editor and 2010 graduand Catherine Wylie is glad that she has yet to join the graduate job rat race but fears that things may not have improved in a year’s time. “I’m glad that I have secured plans to go on to further study, as I know that otherwise I would be on job seeker’s allowance or getting a job in retail or catering. So many careers, and definitely journalism which is my career of choice, require an abundance of volunteering and experience, and I just hope that after I complete my studies next year that I will have enough that makes me stand above other graduates. It really is a dog-eat-dog process,” she said.

BY ANDREW SCOTT

Most artists at Ozzy’s age would not want to toy around with a successful formula, yet Ozzy has never been one to rest on his laurels. ‘Scream’ is his first album not to feature guitarist Zakk Wylde since 1988′s ‘No Rest for the Wicked’. Gus G, formerly of Greek power-metal outfit Firewind, takes up the mantel. Not content with a new guitarist, Ozzy has also drafted in a new drummer, Tommy Clufetos. In theory, this would send out a clear message, that Ozzy was back, and sounding more metal than ever.

Unfortunately, music does not always live up to the artist’s expectations. Most songs are driven by sludgy riffs that make listeners question how much of the album was actually written by the new axeman because this has Wylde’s fingerprints all over it. ‘Scream’ never crosses into poor musical territory, but much of it feels overly familiar. With a worrying lack of coherent song structure, the worst offending tracks sound like a haphazard collection of discarded riffs and scale runs. Undoubtedly, this album has more in common with 2007′s disappointing ‘Black Rain’ as opposed to Ozzy’s classic early albums.

However, it is easy to be overly critical of an album that is, at its core, a pure heavy-metal record. In a musical landscape dominated by emo, pop-punk and indie, it is refreshing to hear the 61 year-old Ozzy, and his talented metal assemble, still melting faces with distorted riffs and lightning solos. There are a few tracks that really stand out as well. The opener ‘Let it die’ for instance would raise hell in any mosh pit. ‘Let me hear you scream’ is another track written for Ozzy’s loyal touring fanbase, whilst ‘Diggin’ me down’ has a superb, chugging riff and a brutal drum beat. The most important thing of all is that Ozzy is having a blast on every track; his voice sounds as uniquely mesmeric as ever.

While ‘Scream’ may not have the same catchy hooks of Ozzy’s earlier works, nor the technical genius of the late Randy Rhoads, it nevertheless receives full marks for heaviness, and the enduring character that Ozzy puts into each and every track. Ozzy has not rediscovered the secret behind his phenomenal 1980′s output, but it should still be enjoyed by anybody who loves to raise the horns and bang their heads.

BY KERRI-ANNE CAMPBELL

The correct academic costume is compulsory for all students who wish to graduate at Queen’s. Any graduate who is not appropriately dressed, or who is not wearing the hood in the approved manner, is not permitted to take part in the ceremony. Gowns must be returned by a specific time and late returns will be cost an additional fee of £150. Any student who fails to return their gown or hood will be charged a fee of £300.

A concerned parent of a final year student said:

“I just presumed that there was no cost. Cost didn’t even enter my head. When I think of the amount of money I have paid Queen’s in the last four years, and now we have to pay them to graduate? It’s scandalous. An absolute disgrace. As if Queen’s couldn’t afford to hold graduation ceremonies and provide gowns, etc. for students who have paid them up to fourteen grand on fees. I’m glad this is being publicised.”

Another parent commented in disbelief, “You’d think that at that price a three course meal would be on offer!”

Most students are not notified of these fees until just a few weeks before graduation. Final year students at Queen’s have expressed their concerns.

One final year English student commented: “I couldn’t believe it costs £55 to graduate at Queen’s. And you don’t even get to keep your gown. I have had to ask my parents for the money because I can’t afford it. It is ridiculous. You would think that Queen’s would have the decency to supply the funds, especially since students pay thousands for fees, books etc… What is even more ridiculous is that we have to pay £5 to receive our degree transcripts. It is a disgrace!”

Another final year student said, “It is unbelievable that students at Queen’s have to pay to attend their own graduation. What about those who can’t afford it? They just aren’t allowed to graduate.”

The first graduation ceremony will take place on Monday 5th July. Queen’s urge that “cheques should be made payable to Queen’s University and prompt payment is appreciated”. Graduates are instructed to pay online, in person or by post. It seems clear that Queen’s are using student graduations as a money making opportunity. When asked to comment on the substantial fees, the QUB alumni office, the organisers of the event, failed to respond.

BY BEN FINCH

Following the announcement, Tim Cooke, Director of National Museums NI, commented, “We are delighted on Northern Ireland’s behalf. This is the first time in Northern Ireland’s history that a prestigious cultural prize of this nature has been awarded to an institution in the region. This prize will encourage us as we endeavour to play a meaningful role at the heart of our changing society.”

The Art Fund Prize Bowl, created by Vladimir Bohm, will be on display in the museum for the next year and Les McLean, Head of Operations at the museum, has already stated that the £100,000 prize will be spent on “something lasting.”

BY LORCAN MULLEN

For a public assembly of 50 or more people, (a number which, according to the bill, can be adjusted on the joint whim of the First and Deputy First Ministers) the authorities must be notified (37 days in advance for a ‘procession’, 22 days for a ‘protest meeting’), organisers must be cited and those breaching the terms of the bill would be subject to arrest without warrant.

Protests are, by their nature spontaneous – they often take place in reaction to sudden, shocking or unifying public events. There can be no doubt that this new oppressive administrative framework will drastically reduce the number of protest rallies held in the North (hardly that many) for no discernible public gain.

The planned spectacle of police Land Rovers circling passionate, if only loosely planned protests is objectionable. A police commander counting to 50 under his breath from his vantage point, and sending his constables wading into a peaceful throng to make scores of arrests, all for the sake of insufficient paperwork, is a chilling, looming travesty.

Under the Human Rights Act 1998, all decisions of UK public authorities are subject to the terms and case law of the European Convention on Human Rights – laws and decisions of politicians and office-holders can be quashed if they are incompatible with the precepts of the Convention.

The Convention holds that:
“Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and to freedom of association with others…no restrictions shall be placed on the exercise of these rights other than such as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society…”

Does the Public Assemblies Bill feel compatible to you? Anyone would imagine human rights law would have been contemplated at the drafting stage.

The question is, were the DUP and Sinn Fein bigwigs involved too customarily thick to consider the human rights implications of their actions, or did they simply not care?

Neither party has any credible legacy of valuing human rights: the hang ‘em all, knee-jerk authoritarianism of the DUP is now working in tandem with the barely-fathomable moral ambiguities of Gerry Adams’s post-ceasefire Sinn Fein. One grew out of waging a devastating war on the state, the other gathered strength as a vehicle for bleak and pitiless whataboutery. It would be madness to trust either with the sane handling of our civil liberties – they had better just keep their grubby fingers off them.

From the student perspective, this bill is potentially disastrous. Direct protesting and picketing have largely died off in recent times; the vast majority of students gladly embrace their ignorant, consumerist, drink-addled cliché-ride though university life, curiously proud in surrendering their lives to the decisions of others.

However fundamental, unacceptable changes to the education system are on the horizon for this year: the noxious cocktail of savage Con-Lib cuts (a 25% cut in the further and higher education budget come October) and default Stormont fecklessness will have a noticeable impact on university life: the cap on fees is likely to be lifted without significant protest and dissent from students.

I would hope at some point in the coming year, for these reasons, we student leaders could summon more than a meagre 50 people in one outside area, registering a righteous fury at such measures. I would hope the state would allow those student leaders to mount a peaceful, public protest under laws happily adhered to in the vast majority of fellow-European states. I would deem a state that doesn’t do this dictatorial.

Wouldn’t you?

(Lorcan Mullen is the new Deputy President of the NUS-USI)

BY SEAMUS J. MULHOLLAND

The document proposes that, in the absence of permission sought from and granted by a new statutory agency entitled the Office of Public Assemblies, Parades and Protests (OPAPP), events comprising fifty plus people, will be illegally constituted. Now, a person who wishes to organise an event, must give thirty-seven days’ notice prior to the date on which it is to take place, and then submit to the decision-making powers of the OPAPP regarding whether or not it has the go-ahead.

Peter Robinson MLA and Martin McGuiness MLA are also seeking to supply the OPAPP with an impressive arsenal of legal weaponry to ensure compliance. The primary deterrent will be judicially-issued Prohibition Orders. Moreover, in the face of defiance, “A constable in uniform may arrest without warrant a person whom [they] reasonably suspect has committed an offence under the Act.”

The arrestee will then find themselves in front of a Magistrate facing, upon summary conviction, imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months and/or a fine not exceeding £5,000.

Local civil liberties groups have condemned the Bill as an attack on rights granted by the European Convention of Human Rights, including freedom of expression and the right to peaceable assembly.

The Belfast Telegraph alleges “The Parades Bill takes a detour from simple common sense”. On the contrary, at sixty-seven pages, I find it provides a rationally thought-through statutory basis on which to make difficult decisions regarding public assemblies. Such events, especially in Northern Ireland, cannot be left to some vague notion of “common sense”. The law, as it will be, sets out the process for dialogue where issues arise surrounding a given public assembly. The cost may well be a thirty-seven day delay, but if this protects the fundamental human rights to peaceful lives, whilst ultimately appeasing our qualified rights of assembly and expression, then this is a cost worth paying. Furthermore, it is important to note that it also provides for fast-tracked applications within seventy-two hours where expediency is required in exceptional circumstances.

Student representatives have noted that the Public Assemblies Bill could represent a curb on academic activism. For the aforementioned reasons, and those which will become apparent in the following prose, I find this small apocalyptic warning wholly unfounded.

In fact the Act also makes many further meritorious and progressive initiatives. For instance it provides that organisers of events must “Take account of the local context and, in particular, of any sensitive locations near proposed assemblies, including locations associated with past conflict or previous public disorder”.

Most reasoned minds will recognise the appeal of incorporating this provision. It would be unfair, for example, to allow people to gather in large numbers in residential areas where they are not wanted.

Moreover the Bill goes some way to protecting the freedoms of minority interest groups. Whilst democracy is a fundamental underpinning of our constitution, it is also desirable to avoid situations of ochlocracy – that is majoritarianism – where the person who shouts or protests loudest wins.  It will be an offence “To prevent or disrupt a lawful assembly” or “to harass persons who are taking part in, or endeavouring to take part in, a lawful public assembly.” Punishments for these offences are every bit as prohibitive as those designed to inhibit participation in illegal gatherings – they are the same .This function of the legislation allows all voices, both booming and timid, to be heard.

It is also important to take note that times have changed too. Just as the majority of Northern Irish citizens have demonstrated their preference for political dialogue, as opposed to the physical demonstrations of the past in making progressive strides forward, in reaching comprises in relation to our owned troubled history, can the physicality of demonstrations relating to contemporary issues not be subsumed and distributed by modern mediums? For instance many of my peers in academia will appreciate that media-driven storms can be just as effective as more primitive demonstrations. Take for example last year’s Facebook campaign to support Rage Against the Machine in attaining pole position in the Christmas popular music chart. Did this involve picketing the home of Simon Cowell or HMV stores? No. Power to the People has taken on a new, more civilised form.

Furthermore, in debating the efficacy of the Public Assemblies Bill one must remember that politicians do not sit on-high making law at a whim, after the fashion of an omnipotent monarch. They serve a societal function; they are accountable to their electorate. Recent and recurrent demonstrations, such as the G8 summit in London last summer and, more locally, the annual Orange Order marches at Drumcree, have revealed the need for legislation to regulate public assemblies and processions. The purpose of the regulations from a political perspective are not to stifle freedom of assembly and expression, it simply is to facilitate the need for the State to be organised in its accommodation of mass activities.

So what’s the verdict on the Public Assemblies Bill? Is it an impingement on genuine democratic freedoms or a justified leveller to give all parties their opportunity in the public arena, with the added benefit of allowing the State to maintain public order and security? Having faith in legal process, my mind firmly favours the latter proposition.

BY BEN FINCH

Les McLean, Head of Operations at the Ulster Museum, believes the museum has done so well due to the “focus on the visitor and their experience”. Over 370,000 people have visited the museum since the £17.2 million refurbishment was completed in 2009 and their reaction has been an “overwhelmingly positive one”.
The Art Fund Prize focuses on the transformation of museums and the impact this has on visitors. All the museums entered have been recently renovated; the Ashmolean’s upgrade cost £61 million. However the Prize does not focus on the biggest or most expensive change but rather “the visitor’s chance to notice change for the better”.

The renovation of the Ulster Museum has led to criticism from some quarters. Many architects were opposed to the new design and Nelson McCausland MLA, Minister for Culture, Arts and Leisure recently called for Creationism and Ulster Scots to have further recognition within the Museum.
McLean is confident that these comments will not affect the museum’s chances of winning the Prize and is pleased with the “interesting debate that has engaged the public more with the museum”.
If the Ulster Museum wins the prize then the £100,000 will be spent on “something lasting”, such as a celebratory piece of art or an education programme that will have “a life beyond the closing date of the competition”.

BY MATTHEW MCKERNAN

The film is very much a personal work, extremely well made and deeply effective. With only three exterior shots, the entire film is set inside a cramped and claustrophobic tank in which four Israeli soldiers work, sweat, eat, sleep and urinate. As they move through a war-ravaged land guided by a pitiless commander, tensions rise with the heat temperature and one by one they fall apart.

The film has been compared favourably with Wolfgang Peterson’s ‘Das Boot’. The setting of ‘Lebanon’ is much more confined than Peterson’s submarine, and unveils a much more powerful vision of the horrors of war. Maoz does not shy away from presenting some of the most harrowing images of war ever put on screen. Families, not just enemy soldiers, find themselves in the firing line. Like the film’s terrified gunner, we see the world through the crosshairs of a gun and when the orders come in to fire on the enemy or civilians, we are put right in the gunner’s place. The moral dilemma is suffocating and the film makes it clear that if we were sitting in that gunner’s place we would do the same thing.

The fim’s realistic war sequences are viewed entirely through crosshairs, inescapably reminding video game fans of the ‘Call of Duty’ series. By accident, Maoz raises questions concerning the morality of recreating war scenes as realistically as possible for the purposes of entertainment. In ‘Lebanon’, those dying are family men and women and innocents with little understanding of the war around them, and their deaths are far from swift, clean and inconsequential.

However, far from a vicious splatter-fest, Maoz is more concerned with the mentality of the four men in the tank. The film is a convincing portrait of men in crisis, bickering and clinging to no longer valid orders. The most uncomfortable sequence occurs when a captured enemy soldier, chained inside the tank, screams for help after his captors explain exactly what they plan to do to him. It is a horribly convincing image of a man in panic.

The film recently won the top prize at the Venice Film Festival and looks to be the beginning of a remarkable career for Maoz. Hopefully, unlike Elim Klinov of the equally horrific ‘Come and see’, Moaz has not said all he needs to say.

BY DAMIEN EDGAR

A stunning display of attacking football from Germany saw Miroslav Kolse, Lukas Podolski and Thomas Muller (2), all find the England net. As stunning as Germany’s attacking array was, it was more shocking how poor England’s defence performed. Time and time again the central pairing of John Terry and Matthew Upson was pulled too far apart, as the Germans pass and move game took glorious effect.

This defensive frailty was perfectly illustrated by Germany’s first goal as a “Hail Mary” ball from Neuer managed to send the England duo into meltdown. Klose, helping the ball into the England net, simultaneously helped the German goalkeeper claim an assist to the goal. Again the defence was pulled all over the pitch for Germany’s second goal, allowing Muller to find Podolski in space, the German hitman smashing the ball through the legs of the advancing David James.

Terry, moved to the right side of central defence to accommodate Upson, seemed out of sorts and Upson himself seemed to be letting his nerves get the better of him, until he rose to thump in a header to make it 2-1 in the 37^th minute.

What followed was arguably the worst decision of the World Cup, a real contender with Kaka’s sending off in the group stages. Following good build up play from England in a rare ten-minute spell of dominance just before half time, Frank Lampard received the ball on the edge of the area. In the sort of position he excels in at club level, Lampard coolly lifted the ball over the despairing hands of Manuel Neuer, glancing the crossbar and finding the back of the German net. However, despite the ball being a clear foot over the line, Uruguayan referee Jorge Larrionda waved play on, much to the consternation of the England players and managerial team.

The England team emerged after the break with an air of defeatism, the wind clearly taken out of their sails by the disallowed goal. Capello’s words had failed to raise the spirits of the players and the Germans began to assert their authority once more,  with Ozil pulling all the strings.

England did their best to keep the game competitive, but it was no surprise when Germany broke in the 67^th minute, Muller ending a delightful move with a composed drive. England goalkeeper David James’ positioning and handling was, however, suspect for the goal, despite the excellent game he had enjoyed up until that point.

There was nothing David James could do three minutes later however, as England midfielder Gareth Barry’s complete lack of pace and belief was exposed by Mesut Ozil. Beating Barry to a long ball despite his opponent’s ten yard head start, Ozil showed shear composure in coolly outpacing Barry and slotting the ball through Ashley Cole’s legs for the advancing Muller to slot past the fruitless lunge of the England goalkeeper.

The game became a formality after that, with every England player playing for the final whistle, to release them from their misery. What has become apparent as a result of this game is that the so-called “golden generation” of England footballers lacked the big game mentality required to justify their nickname, and that this emerging generation of German talent has a much brighter future ahead of them, even if they should fail to make it past the quarter final stage.

BY KERRI-ANNE CAMPBELL
Labour interim leader Harriet Harman responded for the opposition by calling it a ‘Tory Budget’ and predicting that it would increase unemployment and stifle growth. However, Mr Osborne has defended his drastic budget, which is clearly dominated by spending cuts and tax increases, as “unavoidable” and “tough but fair”. The Coalition has promised that the burden will fall on the richest and the poor will be protected. However, researchers claim that the chancellor’s slew of tax rises and massive benefit cuts will hit the poorest hardest.

The new budget will take 880,000 people out of the tax system and give basic rate taxpayers a tax cut of £200 per year. However, this may seem less significant considering that VAT will rise to 20% on 4^th January of next year; a change that will definitely impact day to day student life. There will be no increase in duties on cigarettes, alcohol and fuel; something that many students may appreciate.

As a result of the budget there will also be a two year public sector pay freeze on staff earning more than £21,000. People earning less than £21,000 will each receive a flat pay rise worth £250 in each of the two years. Weekly columnist and former editor-in-chief of The Observer, Will Hutton, has been appointed by the Government  to draw up plans for fairer pay across the public sector so that those at the top of organisations are paid no more than 20 times the salaries of those at the bottom.

Chancellor Osborne stated that he will publish a paper on rebalancing the Northern Ireland economy later this year. What is certain is that from 2013 the large number of Disability Living Allowance claimants in Northern Ireland will face a new medical assessment.

The impact upon university funding still remains unclear. Chancellor Osborne has suggested that there could be cuts of up to 25 per cent of its expenditure. It is feared that universities across the UK will be forced to reduce undergraduate numbers and slash thousands of jobs in order to service the national debt. There are growing concerns that cuts will increase the chances of an increase in tuition fees as the government turns to students to plug a hole in university budgets.

UCU (University and College Union) general secretary, Sally Hunt, said, “Starving education of funds and making families pay more to access a university education, while authorising billions in tax giveaways to big business would be a disaster for the UK. The Corporation Tax cut could have funded university places for all students forced to cough up for university fees.”

Queen’s is a member of the Russell Group which is a collaboration of twenty UK universities that together receive two-thirds of research grant and contract funding in the United Kingdom. In response to the Emergency Budget, Dr. Wendy Piatt, Director General of the Russell Group of research-intensive universities, said, “We sincerely hope that this Government recognises the vital role that leading research-intensive universities play in boosting the economy and improving quality of life and does not subject higher education to cuts of the truly alarming magnitude of 25%… Further cuts would be hugely damaging, threatening the UK’s status as home to world-leading universities.”

Student leaders at Queen’s have already set out plans to oppose any scheme to raise admission fees and opposition will take the form of political pressure on the Stormont Executive.

BY CHRIS JOHNSON

The title of the opening track, ‘The Start of Something Awful’, is regrettably accurate. Jason Gibson clumsily rasps vocals seemingly through gritted teeth and wired jaws, often rhyming off as many words as possible in one breath, resulting in an unbalanced muffled mess.

‘Quarterback Spy’ sounds as though the master tapes were shredded and sewn back together. Guitar and piano lines are often ground into an atonal paste through poorly chosen effects. Again, the vocals here are utterly intolerable, auto-tuned beyond decipherability and recognition, far surpassing the possibility of enjoyment.

Gibson’s grating lyrics attempt poetic sentimentality, but sound obtuse and reek of the melodramatic tones of an upset teenager. This leaves listening to ‘Low Self Esteem Engine’ a tiresome task, and to find a redeeming feature is just as exhausting.

BY CATHERINE WYLIE

The truth should cost nothing, and the Saville Report made the truth publicly and globally official; that the victims of Bloody Sunday were all innocent men, killed unjustifiably and without justification by the State. Critics of the report’s lengthy duration and cost, 12 years and £195 million, should remember why it was absolutely essential that this inquiry be carried out. Saying that they are thinking of the other victims and families of the Troubles who haven’t got a fraction of the attention Bloody Sunday has, critics need to remember the most important factor in this whole affair, and that is that the victims of Bloody Sunday were murdered by Government representatives. They were killed by the State.

The report, due to its fantastic conclusion, is worth every single penny spent by the British Government, as its length and cost is ultimately their fault and that fault needed corrected. Due to Widgery’s lies, I understand why the Saville report was an absolute necessity and why perhaps the Ballymurphy killings have been overlooked in terms of launching an inquiry. There cannot be inquiries like Saville into paramilitary killings as there are too many atrocities on both sides. However, that is not to say that people of this viewpoint value the lives of the victims any less, but it has to be accepted that those killings are different and do not warrant the same sort of inquiry. Michael Mansfield QC has stated repeatedly (even David Cameron has highlighted this), that critics of the Saville Inquiry must accept that when a government’s forces kill innocent civillians there simply has be an inquiry. How can any government, anywhere in the world, expect its people to adhere to law and order, and respect its governance if such disgusting wrongdoings are committed, and then covered up with lies in a report afterwards?

This is the point that critics are missing. Regardless of where one’s political views lie, anyone with any sort of belief in justice, truth and legality, should accept the Saville Report with joy, and that joy should be for not only the exonerated victims and their families, but for the victory over a government trying to cover up the dirty wrongs committed by their military representatives on a day that arguably kicked off The Troubles proper. There is no hierarchy of victims, and to suggest there is insinuates that supporters of the Saville Inquiry value the lives of those killed on Bloody Sunday more than lives lost in other atrocities. Supporters of the Saville Inquiry see it for the absolute necessity it is and their persistence in obtaining justice and the truth has been rewarded sweetly.

The Saville Report is not “revisionism” as Gregory Campbell said, but is instead a 5000 page long document stating exactly what happened on that fateful day in 1972. Describing it as “revisionism” suggests that Campbell holds Widgery’s report in some regard, and that can only be viewed as pitiful. On BBC Spotlight, on the day the report was made public, journalist and political activist (and previous Gown reporter), Eamonn McCann, called Campbell a “sectarian disgrace”, and a vast majority of people would surely agree with that. His insistent refusal to say anything positive about the report has ousted him as an even bitterer man than he has always been viewed. He has repeatedly asked why the Paratroopers were in Derry that day, suggesting that such aggressive force was needed to contain the Catholic violence. He fails to acknowledge why the Catholics were marching in Derry. He also repeatedly says that we now need to move on and stop looking back. In just under four weeks, Campbell will commemorate an event that took place centuries ago, so it seems that he’s quite choosy in what he wants to move on from. He’s not a fan of anything in which Catholics are the victims.

Another way in which Unionist critics of the Saville Report are making themselves look bad is their focus on the revelation about Martin McGuinness “probably” carrying a sub-machine gun. Out of all that is revealed and cleared up in the report, this is just about the least significant thing in it, and to focus on this whilst at the same time ignoring the great victory for justice, is laughable. McGuinness admitted his involvement with the IRA some years ago now. We all know he was a member. He is denying the report’s suggestion that he probably had a machine gun on him by asking how one could possibly hide a sub-machine gun. He has publicly admitted that he was second in command of the local Derry IRA at the time of Bloody Sunday, so the notion of him “probably” having a gun is hardly groundbreaking news. The IRA was active at that time, so it is not interesting to hear that the second in command “might” have had a gun.

Watching the Widgery Report being torn up was possibly one of the most emotional and euphoric moments of this week. Not to mention the anonymous thumbs up which the anticipating crowd could see at a window at the Guildhall, before erupting with cheers of relief and joy that justice had been done. Or the families of the victims emerging from the Guildhall in a state of euphoria, which had been waiting for over 38 years to be released and enjoyed. Euphoria for the families, truth for the victims, justice for the world.

The 14 men shot dead by British paratroopers in Derry on 20th January 1972: INNOCENT

Rod Martin resigned as Entertainments Manager of the Union on Friday.  This follows a year where targets for club nights have been missed by a considerable amount.  On Saturday Shine was forced to move to the Stiff Kitten as only three hundred tickets were sold.  This was not enough to fill the Mandela Hall even if parts had been cordoned off.   Union Director Andrew Dodge said that this was because of the recession and stated that attendance at events this year had been “atrocious” due to a “lack of cash”.

BY BEN FINCH

Rod Martin’s post will be covered by current members of staff until the vacancy is filled.  Dodge claimed that this is an “opportune time” for a rethink in what the Union offers and is a chance for students to “be given what they want, rather than being told”.  The Union will be looking to diversify the entertainment already in place and defend Monday and Thursday Nights from competitors in the area. Rod Martin wasn’t available for comment.

BY BEN FINCH

All four museums have been significantly redeveloped over the past few years. Development of the Ulster Museum cost £17.8 million and since re-opening in October 2009 has become Northern Ireland’s busiest tourist attraction.

Tim Cooke, Director of National Museums NI, said, “We are delighted to be selected for this final stage and are committed to extending engagement with our museum and its collections.” Kirsty Young, chair of the judging panel commented on how the “exceptional quality” of the longlist made the selection a “challenging task”.

A public poll is being used for the first time to inform the judges on their final decision. This closes on June 18th. The Ulster Museum is currently placed first with 35.6% of the vote.

BY BEN FINCH

Plant Drawings! is an unusual exhibition that requires participation. It is inspired by Lee White’s stall of perennial flowers at St. George’s Market, springtime and a long history of horticultural drawing by the artists such as Monet and Van Gogh. You pick a flower pot, pick up some paper, attempt to represent them and in return you keep the flowers. A simpler and more fun idea is impossible to find.

It is an exhibition of interaction and exchange and that changes the rules of what an exhibition is. There is no standing around, trying to discern what ideas so-and-so artist is trying to represent or even what the art is. Instead there is the reward of a feeling of pride, a large smile and a pretty potted plant that can be put in your garden and will grow year on year. The artist/spectator boundary is well and truly smashed.

Plant Drawings! takes place at PS2 on Donegall Street and runs until the 3rd July. Drawing workshops for all ages and talents will be taking place at PS2 and St. Georges Market. A normal exhibition of the artwork created will happen in early July at St. Georges Market and PS2. For further details visit www.pssquared.org.

BY BEN FINCH

Despite failing to achieve either, the flotilla has been more successful at achieving its political goals. Israel’s reaction has been condemned by all of their allies. It has massively increased tension with Turkey, their only Muslim ally. The Turkish Prime Minister, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, raged, “It is no longer possible to cover up or ignore Israel’s lawlessness. This bloody massacre by Israel on ships that were taking humanitarian aid to Gaza deserves every kind of curse.” Israel’s closest friend in Europe, Italy, “deplored” the violence and the only nation not to call for the blockade to stop was the US.

Israel’s silent partner in the blockade of Gaza, Egypt, immediately opened the border crossing, with Gaza and Israeli newspapers, while showing support for the IDF’s intentions, called the assault a “fiasco”. The IDF’s tactics have been criticised and they were either naive not to expect resistance or trying to use the operation for their own political ends. Following the events, the incredibly efficient Israeli PR machine leaped into action, and footage was released that showed activists attacking the boarders but none of the fatal firefights.

The assault took place in international waters, where the law onboard a ship is that of the flag it flies. This also means that it is illegal to take prisoners. While over six hundred activists detained have now been deported, Israel’s actions are in clear defiance of International Law, which they hold very little respect for. The activists were forced to accept they had entered Israel illegally, despite their transport from international waters by the IDF. In theory, the perpetrators of the deaths may be open to prosecution under Turkish law as the Mavi Marmara, on which the deaths occurred, was flying the Turkish flag.

The final ship of the flotilla, the MV Rachel Corrie, is currently approaching the area of Israel’s disastrous raid on Monday. It is named after an American peace activist killed by Israeli forces in Gaza. Turkey has said that the ship will have a military escort and many other governments have called for the ship to be allowed to land in Gaza. The Rachel Corrie is out of Dundalk, flies the Irish Flag and is carrying Mairead Maguire, a Nobel Peace Prize winner for her efforts in Ireland.

Following the widespread condemnation of the first attack, Israel’s hands are surely well and truly tied. They will have to let the ship land or risk turning a crisis into international war. The problem is that Israel tends to take the most offensive course of action and their current, unrelenting stance indicates that this will be the case. While they may not expect much resistance from a 66 year old woman and four other crew, if there is a military escort the results will surely be even more disastrous than Monday.

Editor – Connor Daly

News editor – Kerri-Anne Campbell
Arts editor – Ben Finch
Features editor – Emma Gallen
Sport editor – Damien Edgar

Photographic editor – Claire Wright

Design editors  – Niall Mooney and Rose Kelly

Business managers – Niall Crozier and Richard Burns

BY LAURA SHEARER

Taking the audience to the heart of the legend, the film opens with a candlelit scroll of medieval script that defines the era and sets the audience up for huge historical inaccuracies.  The action of the film begins like a hazy memory, depicting a land not so far removed from the typical English countryside scenery of today and we are launched straight into a battle scene.  The political dramas of England at this time are weakly addressed and this is surprising given the attention paid to making a statement as a film that wishes to be themed as a historical epic.

The characters float past our eyes, each specifically allocated a different amount of screen time on their introduction that points out how important they will be to the narrative.  As boring as this is for a well-oiled film viewer, it’s completely stereotypical of the actors involved.  Adequately fulfilling the blockbuster familiarity of course, but surely the average audience is a lot more intelligent than Scott has identified with and don’t need to be told all the time where they are viewing.

Early on in the feature Scott shows huge gaps in his storytelling technique, but perhaps I should give him credit for trying to cram so much history and folklore into tiny sections.  Yet even his decision to include so much is quite clouded by his love of lengthy action sequences.  The most appalling aspect of the narrative structure is the constant descriptions of our hero’s travels.  Each place Robin arrives at is introduced by subtitles and the same long shot of the characters arriving in that area.  Not only is this relentless, it’s horribly pointing out the very disjointed narrative.

When little pieces of extra characterisation are bluntly slapped into the dialogue then I fear I’ve little patience for such a lack of creative enthusiasm.  Russell Crowe’s dubious accent is hugely confusing and to see such a well paid actor make a mess out of the film’s continuity demonstrates a shocking lack of skills in relation to the amount of vocal training he undertook in preparation.  The only semi-interesting or mildly complex character is Mark Strong’s role as Godfrey.   This is purely because he has more depth than the others, leading a dual identity as a spy and a fraud and only working for his own means.

What I failed to understand are the adjustments that Scott felt necessary to tell his adaptation.  Besides all the historical and political aspirations of the film, the love plot between Marian and Robin has been stubbornly switched for a misjudged rom-com affair that clumsily fumbles through as a discourse.  Rather than the major draw as the folklore eludes, instead we are faced with the uppity style of an Austen novel and not even much of a source of humour in their growing relationship.

Instead of a hero with a good sense of pride and clear path of justice we are given an angry and lost soldier as he attempts to find himself, and on the way gets caught up in issues far greater than can comprehend.  It just passes that he can believably bring some sense to the commotion, yet he doesn’t seem to have such a major angle on his beliefs as the legends tell.

Watch out for the single moment of cinematography and editing that develops a bit of skilfully planned camerawork in the final battle sequence.  It’s a brief few seconds but it’s colourful and effective.  It’s not a key edit or anything withstanding but it’s really well put together and it’s dramatic.  Big hint is that it’s in the tide and provides a huge contrast to the otherwise predictable and lazy use of equipment in this epic scene, there’s others very similar so blink and you’ll miss it.

Well done to Disney, who in my eyes still hold the title of the most entertaining and enjoyable adaptation of the legend, Scott should have taken heed of what viewers understand of the legend.  Instead of attempting to offer a moody and bleak interpretation, I’m suggesting that perhaps the more inevitable light heartedness of Robin Hood, Men in Tights has taken away from the depth that Scott has tried and failed to depict.  When Gladiator still remains one of the most inventive period narratives in mainstream cinema, this version just doesn’t compare.  Too many farfetched changes have been made to a loved narrative and it just doesn’t show the same strength as previous Scott films.  Sadly the artistry of the end credits perfectly outline the ideology of the legend, as well as romanticising the hero, so as the most impressive sequence, there’s small hope for the feature itself.

BY LAURA SHEARER

Director Mike Newell’s previous big budget accomplishments, including Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire (2005) and Mona Lisa Smile (2003), make him the ideal addition to the team as he proves he can handle large scale, but also studio pressure.  All that built the empire that is the Pirates of the Caribbean saga can be found here, so brace yourself for a well rounded presentation of that infamous winning formula that Bruckheimer has eloquently mastered.

The opening looks very reminiscent of The Mummy trilogy, with the narrator and the maps, a rough attempt at historical placement, and a dreamlike quality from the soft focus of the camera.  Very quickly we are enveloped in the exoticism of the ancient land and for a moment we forget the origin of the film.  Yet even early on the film kind of tries to permit a small homage to its game source.  The strategic planning of the castle attack is accompanied by a camera that swivels around the prince’s descriptions, giving the sensation of moving around models.  During storming the castle there is that nostalgic game quality, but instead of the player having control, the passive viewer witnesses with little thrill.  As the prince looks around the camera takes his point of view, shakily depicting the game player moving the joysticks to gain a scope of the area.  This is a fairly adequate look at how a game can be turned into a film, but it doesn’t stand for much in this adaptation sadly.

On a more positive note, there’s that entertaining lightweight feel to the script, even if it is quite cheesy.  Some sources of comedy include a ringleader slave who loves his duty free and racing ostriches, but then there’s the love plot between our two protagonists.  What immediately struck me as a bad career move for Jake Gyllenhaal and Gemma Arterton, because it really doesn’t involve much acting, turns out to be perhaps what their careers needed in mainstream terms.  These are successfully mixed in with a strong heroic narrative, an almost confusing time travel theme and the mystical undertones of the main storyline.  You’ve got yourself a modern blockbuster that is the perfect warm-up to the forthcoming huge budgets of this summer.

Surprisingly there is a lot of skilled choreography in the fight scenes.  Well rehearsed blade-work is always impressive on a large scale and there are some lovely fast paced archery shots.  The editing of the action sequences goes beyond expectations and is clearly enhanced by the settings.  Regardless of how accurate, the locations are well presented and look extremely lush as far as fantasy scenery goes.  From the barren desert landscapes to the highly detailed props, even if it’s not very believable, they do definitely bring an extra hint of luxury to the screen.  I fail to see how money hasn’t oddly enough been well spent on this production.  The time spent in the cinema is pure indulgent escapism, which isn’t at all challenging or thought provoking, so in many respects a great popcorn flick.

The referendum is an opportunity for students to register their opposition to the proposals put forward recently by the Russell Group (of which Queen’s is a member and subscriber) – specifically, a removal of the cap on fees, with the eventual aim of a US-style market in education and the lowering of the wage threshold at which graduates are forced to repay their loan.

Union President Shane Brogan told students in today’s all-student email:

“The proposal, if implemented by Westminster, would see dramatic changes to student fees such as expecting students to take on private debt to fund more of the costs of teaching a student for a year (around £7,000 per year for an Arts student), it would also mean that students pay their student loans back when they are earning less money, by reducing the current threshold from £15,000, and substantial increases to the interest students pay on their current student loans.”

Students are also faced with two small technical changes to the Union’s constitution that could not be approved at Council due to problems with members’ attendance and consequent instances of quorate.

Ratification 2 is especially important, as it is intended to boost turnout in referenda through a longer voting period. Ratification 1 would formalise the current practice of referring to Andrew Dodge as the Director of the Union.

http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=4131653&id=507521051#!/group.php?gid=117162111657422

http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=4131653&id=507521051

Be careful, everyone, the travel bug is in the air. Once you get the giddy head, the procrastinating spirit and the shaky legs, you’re done for. The only cure is to buy a cheap ticket to somewhere and go.

I caught it right before Easter break, but luckily, I had bought tickets a month before on ryanair.com to Porto in Portugal and Marseilles in France for the first week and a half of vacation. Make sure you get lots of sleep, go on a boat tour and get soaked by a freezing cold ocean. I suggest some alcohol, too, of course… maybe a blue coricacão drink with 7up, or a Malibu shot. As odd as it sounds, I also suggest you drop your phone in a wet bathroom and that you make sure your purse or pocket contents get caught up in the ocean and get carefully damaged. It helps you get out of control and your frustration soon becomes laugher because there is nothing you can do.

Even after three nights in Porto, I was no better. In fact, I was only feeling worse… the fizzy headache and jittery skin was just becoming more troublesome. So off I went, almost missing my flight, which gave me a great adrenaline rush (it’s great for curing the travel bug) to Marseilles. I arrived with my friend, got totally tricked into paying sixty euro for a cab ride (also helps, it increases the anger and feeling of stupidity as a tourist) and then settled in for some days at the beach with lots of sun and crusty, yet soft, French bread… and of course, meringues.

I had never travelled around Europe like this before. The only other times I had been in Europe I had either been in one country for a week or so with my parents, or I had been in France for two weeks with my French class in high school for a mini study abroad experience. On this trip, I realized just how lightly I can pack and get away with it (you really don’t need a hairdryer or multiple pairs of jeans for eight days), how food tastes best when it’s really cheap (especially a two euro bacon burger in Porto) and how fun cramped hostel rooms are when you’re with friends (it’s like summer camp all over again with bunk beds).

As is the case with every vacation, when it’s over, you have a fresher mind for going back to the grinding every day… except, luckily for me that just meant a two day break in Belfast before heading back to New York for a visit home to get over some homesickness. However, considering this is supposed to be my time of adventure, the gods didn’t let me down here, either.

A few days before I was supposed to fly back to Belfast in time for classes to start again on Monday, April 19^th, a volcano in Iceland erupted…

Deemed by the Australian press as a film that Australia could be proud of, and winner of the Camera D’Or award at the 2009 Cannes Film Festival, ‘Samson and Delilah’ is a love story told unlike any other.  The small world in which the lovers inhabit is suddenly shaken when they are forced outside their comfort zones by their aborigine community.  Mistaken as social outsiders, the two youths are confronted with a very foreign environment and their relationship is the building block that keeps them going.  Director Warwick Thornton offers a truly original portrayal of young love and the struggle to come to grips with modernity in the midst of tradition.

BY LAURA SHEARER

www.queensfilmtheatre.com

One of the foremost striking components of this film that is evident from the very opening sequence is the great use of natural lighting.  It is an aspect that is introduced with such ease and the simplicity of its inclusion reflects the atmospheres in each scene perfectly.  Within the outback scenes it is representative of the estranged but peaceful community’s home life, but in the city space it becomes a showcase of the youths fear and lack of understanding.  Masterfully filmed, the lighting decisions are a clear creative control; always giving the viewer that little bit extra, quite efficiently lulling the audience into the romance of the narrative.

The sound design is simply astonishing.  The quality of the sound editing keeps a distinct sense of humanity and realism as well as maintaining the really moving subtle humour of the film.  It’s inherent from the first few mesmerising scenes that the skilfully crafted sound will play a huge part in our viewing experience.  Viewers won’t be let down by the well developed gripping tensions and will be taken aback by the vastly enjoyable easy flow of plot that the sound design helps along.

The cinematography is graphic, keeping audience attentions transfixed on the unfolding events.  As the continuity editing flickers by seamlessly, the camera angles and subject matters show an avid sense of artistry with the filmic mode.  There isn’t a single second of this film that won’t have you incredibly lost within its inspiring imagery.

The tale is cute in an endearing way, making it a real indie love story classic.  The superbly engrossing aesthetic feeling of young love is more than the key draw.  The lover’s tale is oddly not made relative to its western viewership, yet it effortlessly presents itself as something we can all understand on a compassionate level.  The exoticism of the film’s locations aids the developing sensation of distances within this tale of intimacy, overall giving a vastly rewarding consciousness that even by the roll of the credits is maintained as an almost numbed awareness.

The moody changing of the landscapes openly matches the emotions of the couple as they power along in their journey of personal development.  Equally, the narrative is haunting and perpetually sad, but always fresh and intriguing.  Thornton’s work is gritty and harsh, but it’s immensely watchable and is definitely deserving of more attention.

BY LAURA SHEARER

The major complaint is the clunking attempt to mesh together the action genre with good old fashioned slapstick humour.  Supposedly meant to add to the genre, offering viewers a more intensely comic experience, yet it falls short revealing a lack of seamless authenticity.  The ridiculousness of the referenced slapstick does help in emphasising character stereotypes, but these are already pretty inherent in the minds of the viewer and those who haven’t seen the first won’t struggle to work out who stands where. 

Perfectly suited to the role of Ivan Vanko, Mickey Rourke is immediately introduced as the brooding bad guy.  An over the top western ideological presentation of the vodka swilling Russian underground thug that holds a grudge is done justice by Rourke’s lack of dialogue and rough physical presence.  His accent is by-passable and those little evil chuckles really give him a genuinely mysterious edge.  The costumes are one of the elements that have been treated with care, so when Rourke unravels invention after evil invention, it’s thrilling to see how much fun he’s had filming. 

Scarlet Johansson plays the feisty Black Widow come Russian spy with such ease it’s difficult to see how this was anything but a cleverly executed career choice.  She does her usual feminine chic style, roughed up with a mysterious alter-ego superhero personality that is delivered with a high level of professionalism.  Clearly a good casting decision for an injection of sex appeal to the film, but the expected indie quirk so apparent in Johansson’s other film roles is severely lacking. 

Lots of weaponry, cars and boys playing with toys leaves mixed audiences divided on the inclusion of female characters placed so far into the foreground of the narrative.  The typically moral negatives that come with the progression of a corporate company is shown in the egotistical Tony Stark of Stark industries and as much as these aren’t exactly righted, they are challenged by the underdog Ivan Vanko who’s aim is to topple Stark industries.  This is all too typical of the mainstream narrative, and without giving away much of the soppy ending, lessons are expected to be learnt.  The narrative puts a heavy weight on the political implications of the story, with claims to world peace and rivalry between the democratic USA and the almost soviet Russia.  An interesting debate between art and egos is presented in the flimsy conflict dialogues between Stark and Pepper Potts, but this is just another element of the film that makes it gravitate towards the attention waiving run time.  In all, do go see for that extra comic to film fix, but with news of a third film, it’s nothing to get excited about.

BY BEN FINCH

This is because of Cameron’s ill advised statement on the Northern Ireland public sector and how it needs to be reduced. The public sector in Northern Ireland has reduced the effects of the recession here and has kept thousands of people in employment throughout the Troubles. While a reduction in the Civil Service may be necessary, it should be slow, controlled and not affect frontline services. It should also be met with an increased investment in the local economy, rather than trying to lure big business from overseas. However the vampiric George Osborne has been preparing for “Slash and Burn” all over the UK and it is very worrying that Northern Ireland is top of the hitlist.

In the regions of Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales there has been a clear rejection of Conservatism. Only 8 Tory MPs, out of 117, were elected from these areas, seven from Wales and one from Scotland, with 9 Lib Dems in total from the regions, if Naomi Long is ignored. This means that Northern Ireland is essentially being ruled by England, by a government that the electorate has shown they don’t want by removing the two UUP seats held. While the DUP has traditionally voted with the Conservatives (about 90% of the time) they took the decision to support a possible Labour Government to protect Northern Ireland’s interests.

On top of all this the Conservatives show stronger support for the Union than Labour have done and are likely to take a harder line on Nationalism, which will push its supporters further away from the government. The result seems to have led to an increased unity among politicians from the province, as the SDLP, Alliance, DUP and Sylvia Hermon all decided to join the potential rainbow alliance in order to oppose cuts in the public sector and the block grant. It also appears that, along with Scotland and Wales, there has been an increase in Nationalism as people would prefer to rule themselves due to fears about the state of local economies as the Conservatives tend to ignore and underfund the regions. This can only lead to further tensions between regional government and Parliament.

Universities are likely to see a decrease in funding from the Government, which will only see them wanting to increase the already unfair tuition fees, which are a premium on education and discourage many people from furthering their knowledge. As students we have to be prepared to resist this and anything that we see to be bad for our regional economy, where we expect to be employed soon and a double dip recession could destroy.

The Lib Dems appear to have pulled the Tories to the left but it remains to be seen just what has gained their support and just how far right they have allowed themselves to go in order to get bums on government seats. Hopefully they can temper the excesses of a generation that has grown up with Thatcherism. But in deciding to take the Tory whip they may not be able to without bringing down the government.

The Tories will have to affect a central stance in relation to Northern Ireland and treat the electorate fairly or else a situation, slowly becoming more dangerous and only supported by a few, could explode. Cuts to public services, such as education and healthcare, could destroy the increasingly fair and harmonious society we live in. We have already used our democratic voice to oppose these cuts and we will have to continue to use it over the next few years to ensure society remains.

BY MATTHEW OKOT

Brown was there from day one in 1997, spending a decade as Chancellor of the Exchequer. He was consumed by jealousy of his younger colleague, Tony Blair, who got to 10 Downing Street first. Their fractious relationship hampered Labour’s ability to govern effectively. When Brown finally got Blair’s job, it was a poisoned chalice. It was possible to feel sympathy for Brown but he authored his own misfortune.

It is true that Blair got out in time, yet if Brown got the top job too late, this was his own fault for not deposing Blair when his rival became a liability after the Iraq war. Brown dithered constantly, to the exasperation of his own supporters. He was willing to wound Blair but afraid to strike. It was this dithering that undid his premiership. Brown made a deceptively good start and he stoked up election fever in the autumn of 2007. Yet a sudden Tory poll surge scared him. He scrapped the election after seeing the opinion polls. Brown denied that the polls had influenced his decision – nobody believed him. He had ‘bottled it’. His authority collapsed. Labour MPs became rebellious. The government started its drift to defeat. Brown had snookered himself.

Opponents who felt that he lacked the character to lead were vindicated. As the global recession started to bite, Brown felt his hour had come. The economy was his speciality. Brown led a commendable rescue of the banking system but the recession threw an unfavourable light on his Chancellorship. Despite boasting repetitiously about his own economic skills, Brown had left Britain inadequately prepared to cope with a recession. The economic castle had been built on the sands of debt and borrowing.

Late in the day, Brown re-discovered state intervention; an admission that his policies as Chancellor were wrong. The self-styled economic genius leaves a grisly economic legacy for the next government. Often Brown talked about his ‘moral compass’ but he presided over the 10p tax debacle, which hurt the lowest paid, whilst the fiasco over accommodation for the Ghurkhas revealed a leader out of touch.

The war in Afghanistan was the centrepiece of the war on terror, yet New Labour skimped on defence spending. For a man who lived and breathed politics, Brown was extremely bad at it. Many of Brown’s defenders pointed out that the media were focussing on his dour image rather than his policies. Yet many of his policies were simply wrong. There is no doubt that Brown possesses intelligence and conviction but he simply lacked the courage of his convictions. Gordon Brown was up to the job of prime minister, if only he had never had it.

 BY GOWN REPORTER

Queen’s Intermediate began with a fine win over Oxford Brookes, producing a one-length lead over their rivals to take the gold medal in a time of 5:58.22. The Champions eight final began shortly after. Finishing just two seconds ahead of second placed Oxford, QUB claimed a gold medal in first position. The women’s intermediate pair and men’s Championship Sculler (Williamson) reached their respective finals.

 The Queens ladies’ Beginner four won the gold medal in their event, comfortably seeing off Cardiff in second place. The men’s Intermediate four continued their good form, claiming gold in their final having beat Imperial College London by two seconds. Light-weights Damian Hannon and Jonathan Mitchell also made it to their final, but suffered a narrow defeat at the hands of the U23 Great Britain internationals of Imperial College London.

 The women’s Intermediate four continued Queen’s University’s fine form, but narrowly finished third in their semi-final. In the end QUB ladies claimed a bronze medal position. A convincing Cambridge took the gold, 6 seconds ahead of the Queen’s ladies.

 The ladies’ Beginner eight confidently defeated Cardiff in the final by a comfortable 6 second margin, taking gold in their first BUCS Championship.

 A promising men’s quad claimed victory over Newcastle and Durham to seal gold. This final contest of the competition ensured Queen’s Rowing left Nottingham with six gold medals, one silver and one bronze in the championship. Queen’s senior men will certainly take great confidence from this landmark occasion to their next event, to be held at the International Wedau-Regatta, Duisburg, Germany on the 14-16 May 2010.

BY SUZANNE COURTNEY

Napoleon intrigued the crowd and who were not let down as they provided a very energetic performance. The lead singer captivated the audience with the lovely melodies and enticing lyrics. Following Napoleon’s set, Kowalski fans struggled to find a place to stand as they attracted a large following. Kowalski, likened to Death Cab For Cutie, are among the most professional and rounded sound within the Belfast music scene and therefore deserve the following they attract. The stunning voice and infectious melodies got the crowd up and dancing and kept their attention for the whole set. Each song carried its own unique sound, providing a diverse set and lived up to the high expectations of their reputation. The three bands performed a very entertaining and energetic show and left a satisfied crowd keen to see each band play again.

BY BEN  FINCH

After a funny start, the play builds to an excellent second half as Harpingon’s children try to beg, borrow or steal his money and fall in love. Harpingon turns out to be an apt pun as he greatly enjoys the sound of his own voice. The boundaries of the stage are ignored with characters roaming around and interacting with the audience. However, this led to a heckler shouting out during Harpingon’s final speech. She was hilarious though and no-one seemed to mind.

The play has been relocated to Belfast and achieves this through witty references to areas of the city, Northern Ireland and the inability of various Scottish characters to understand the Northern Irish accent. While retaining some of the more pretentious language of the seventeenth century, a majority of the dialogue has been updated to be understandable to a contemporary audience allowing a self-aware critique of the play itself to take place.

Despite a first half that can seem slow at times, with some jokes missing their targets, The Miser is a very funny and relevant production, that manages to highlight the absurdities of obsession and the banking system.

The Miser runs at Elmwood Hall until 9 July 2010

Once in a blue moon a film comes along which has the power to both completely challenge and flip your preconceptions of a subject,  remaining in your head long after you leave the cinema. Usually these films are lengthy, epic blockbusters involving a re-telling of a historic event, or on the other hand, serious, tense thrillers, anything really apart from a laugh-out-loud comedy about four idiots living in Doncaster. But then that’s the magic of Four Lions.

BY KATHRYN McCANN

www.queensfilmtheatre.com

Four Lions is essentially billed as a funny, thrilling comedy that illuminates modern Jihadism through the prism of farce. Controversial?  Definitely, yet the provocative and original nature of the film only serves to heighten its appeal.  The film does serious damage to your moral compass, sending it haywire as the audience are forced to look behind and beyond the labels of “terrorist” and “suicide bomber” to instead the ridiculousness of humanity itself.  The story illuminates Jihadists as human beings, as exemplified through the close bond between the four men, and especially the protective relationship between ringleader Omar and the dim child-like Waj who brings a prayer teddy bear with him on the trip to Pakistan’s training camp. This ingeniously results in reluctant feelings (shock, horror) of actual sympathy and empathy for the characters as they head to London for their doomed suicide mission.

Although Four Lions is a slow burner, I realised I was witnessing something special around an hour into the film when experiencing at the exact same moment, the very strange paradox of being both horrified,  and saddened by events on screen, yet unable to stop myself from genuinely laughing out loud. Make no doubt about it, director Chris Morris outdoes himself on funny, with dialogue where would be suicide bombers compare how being a Mujahedeen is like being on the ‘rubber dingy rapids’ at Alton towers as opposed to just waiting in the queue.  It is a credit to Morris that the film is successful in portraying slapstick in-your-face humour alongside clever subtleties which make a comment on how society wrongly deals with the threat of terrorism today. The most notable of these subtleties is the distinction between Omar and his more conservative Muslim brother which demonstrates the danger of falsely equating the religion of Islam itself with any sort of fanaticism. Four Lions is not all about humour though, with a beautifully ironic scene at the end portraying the hopelessness of the idealistic notion of martyrdom.

There is no doubt that this film will receive a fair bit of criticism due to its sensitive subject matter. However it will be a tragedy if this criticism overshadows the brilliance of the film itself. Is terrorism funny? Of course it’s not. But this film is not about making a joke out of terrorism, the joke is on the group of endearingly idiotic and clueless men and their relationship and conflict with each other.

Rumours that star of Cold Feet, Five Minutes of Heaven and the old BT adverts, Jimmy Nesbitt, had been spotted at Queen’s on Tuesday have been confirmed by Dr. Jim Campbell of the School of Sociology, Social Policy and Social Work.

BY BEN FINCH

Nesbitt was attending an event run by the WAVE Trauma Centre, an organisation that works with victims of the Troubles, which he is patron of. This is an area which the school has received funding from the EU to deliver teaching. Dr. Campbell said that the event was very good, with presentations from Queen’s staff, as well as people working in other related areas.

Following the Ulster Museum’s £17.2 million refurbishment, it has been nominated for the prestigious Art Fund Prize. This could be worth £100,000 to the museum as well as being a “huge accomplishment”. The public are being urged to vote for the museum to win on the Art Fund website. The Ulster Museum is currently in first place with 25.5% of the popular vote, but is closely followed by Blists Hill Victorian Town, near Birmingham on 21.9%. It is also up against institutions such as the Natural History Museum, London, and the Great North Museum, Newcastle.

BY BEN FINCH

Judges have been visiting museums on the longlist and will soon be making the decision for the shortlist, taking into account the public vote. Crimewatch presenter Kirsty Young is a member of the panel. Unable to visit with the other members of the judging panel, she visited the Ulster Museum on April 14. These visits are said to have gone very well, and the judges were “suitably impressed”. Gillian McLean, from the Ulster Museum, has said that they need to keep up the momentum in keeping visitors coming to hold on to first place.

Jim McGreevy of National Museums NI said, “The Art Fund Prize of £100,000 is a most prestigious accolade and to win it would be a huge accomplishment for the Ulster Museum and indeed, for Northern Ireland.”

Previous winners of the Art Fund prize include the Wedgewood Museum and The Lightbox Museum and Gallery.

The refurbished museum contains new exhibitions on Irish and natural history as well as a poignant and balanced look at The Troubles. There is also an excellent series of art and fashion galleries on the upper levels.

To vote for the Ulster Museum in the Art Fund Prize visit www.artfundprize.org.uk/2010/vote. Voting closes on 7 May with the shortlist being announced at the end of May.

BY HANNAH GOODALL

Melancholic, enigmatic, pop-enthused, unique, exciting, original are rather poor ways of describing this one off twelve track wonder. Lover, Strange Girl, You’ve Changed and Electric City are extremely catchy and alluring. Rosie’s voice has that same enticing tone that has drawn thousands of fans to the feat of Florence and Marina. Stylistically, Rosie & The Goldbug could be likened to Tuuli or The Donnas, an all girl band who know how to handle their instruments. Vocally and lyrically, Rosie & The Goldbug have a rather vintage sound, a combination of beautiful lyrics and ethereal voices quite similar to the Puppini Sisters.

All comparisons aside though, the album takes on a life of its own. The haunting and delicate allure makes the music hard to forget and even harder to describe. Each track has a similarity whilst remaining completely different from that which proceeds or succeeds it. Endearing as it is, it does however have one fault.  All the elements which work in favour of the band creating a fan base unfortunately become rather tedious after more than two repeat listens. It is something to be savored, to be enjoyed sparingly, but maybe this works in its favour. An album you can enjoy in the moment.  Truly a rare thing in the music industry. Made even rarer by the fact that since the album’s release the band have since dis-banded, for reasons unknown to devout followers, with no hope of reforming or recording a new album.

A gem, never to be repeated Rosie &The Goldbug is an essential album for the truest of music lovers. However, all hope is not lost. Rosie Vanier has announced her solo career has finally kicked off. With a tour planned for June and an array of catchy new demos available on her Myspace and Facebook pages for hungry fans to devour, we are not to be disappointed. Rosie is an extremely talented female vocalist and this preview of her new solo material is exactly what the fans want. Although there are clear similarities between the works of Rosie & The Goldbug and her solo material, there is enough of a difference for a new audience to be lured into the world of vintage chic glamour, ethereal rock and kitsch vintage which Rosie Vanier oozes in abundance. We can expect great things from this new UK female musician, and the current queens of the scene have a new rival on their radars for sure.

President Shane Brogan will bring this argument to Management Board tomorrow on behalf of The Gown editorial team and Gown Trust. Gown management met with Union and University officials last Friday to discuss the ongoing issues between the independent newspaper and the Union, which have caused significant difficulties for the newspaper to continue operating as normal. As part of the clubs and societies review, the Union is proposing to move The Gown from their office on the 3rd floor of the Union into a shared office. The Gown team is still suspended and members have been denied access since Monday 15th March.

UPDATE: The suspension imposed on The Gown from their office on Monday 15th March was lifted at this evening’s Management Board meeting.

There are obvious traditional and historical reasons as to why we believe The Gown should remain in an exclusive office, mainly due to the paper enjoying the usage of an office in the Union for decades. But The Gown editorial team and Gown Trust are adamant that the future survival of the newspaper depends on the continued use of an exclusive office. The internal affairs of a newspaper are by their nature private and confidential, and it is unthinkable to expect the independent student newspaper to share space which would compromise the very essence of its existence. This year The Gown’s current office has been used daily by a core team of 10 members, a wider voluntary body of 50, and a focal point of reference for hundreds of occasional student writers, not to mention whistle blowers, morning, noon and night.

BY CATHERINE WYLIE

You will see from the sign-in file at the ground floor reception just how often this year’s volunteers made use of the 3^rd floor office. As editor, I can confirm that each and every time the key was signed out, it was to genuinely work on the development and furthering of the newspaper, with hours upon hours of work going into keeping the publication fortnightly and the website updated as often as possible (The website has been updated daily for the majority of the academic year). I would be confident in saying that the small space taken up by The Gown on the top floor of the Union was possibly one of the most utilised spaces in the Union, and the most productive in terms of helping students and providing a service, this academic year. Without an exclusive office, but instead a shared environment, I would very much doubt if The Gown could continue in its present form of steadily returning to its glory days of former decades.

A newspaper office is notoriously busy and fast, and can be often disruptive, noisy, untidy, and high spirited. It would be unfair for the Union to expect any club, society or organisation to share with The Gown. Again, as editor, I have been in the office almost daily all year (up until the ban) and can vouch for what goes on in the daily running of the paper and its office. We have archives that go back to the 1950s, we have a selection of books left by editors and reporters in days gone by, we have a large amount of space dedicated to the business and financial side of the newspaper, and we talk, discuss, deliberate, debate, have differences of opinion and generally spend 100% of the time being very vocal. A shared office environment accommodating The Gown and another organisation would not be a productive working space for that organisation due to constant interruptions. The suggestion that each would have dedicated hours of working so that they would never be in the office at the same time is a nonsensical suggestion due to both the nature of breaking news and the total confidentiality expected by whistle blowers, and indeed anyone at all who speaks to Gown volunteers about any issue. To expect anyone to share with The Gown, whether it is on the basis of restricted and dedicated hours is simply unacceptable and would lead to inevitable clashes which would become problematic for sabbatical teams for years to come. It would eradicate any good faith or strengthened relations encouraged by a memorandum or document signed between The Gown and the Union, and as this year has shown, a particularly rocky relationship and bad feeling between the two is very stressful for all involved, and is therefore to be avoided at all costs.

The Gown has had an important presence on campus for 55 years, and has become a widely known and revered publication. Not only does it act as an independent voice for the student body, but it provides invaluable experience for a vast number of QUB students in the fields of journalism, business, advertising, design, and photography. The paper has been, de facto, an acting School of Journalism at Queen’s for over half a century, and has been an influential launch pad for innumerable successful journalists, both at home and abroad. There has been more editions published this year than in any other year, and we see the newspaper going from strength to strength from this point onwards. The success of the plethora of previous Gown writers is evidence that it is a fantastic beginning for anyone who wants to pursue a career in journalism, and an outlet that should be encouraged rather than quashed. Professor Gregson echoed these sentiments at our re-launch earlier in the academic year.

We ask you to put aside any ill-feeling you have for this year’s editorial team and volunteers, and instead focus your attentions on the fact that next year, and beyond, will bring fresh editorial teams that all have one common goal. That is to emulate the enviable successes of previous Gown volunteers who went on to realise their hopes of succeeding in the cut throat world of journalism. Keep this tradition at QUB alive and re-instate the independent voice which sparks healthy debate and makes the Students’ Union feel like a Students’ Union.

The above statement is supported by The Gown editorial team and Gown Trust:

The Trust consists of:

On Wednesday 21^st of April, the QUB Orange Society undertook what is hoped to be the first of many signature cultural and historic annual excursions.  The Dan Winters Project 2010, sponsored by the Queen’s Annual Fund, saw Orange Society members join with friends and guests to visit Dan Winters’ cottage near Loughgall.  Dan Winters’ cottage is prominent in Orange folklore as being credited as the birthplace of the Orange Order, which has since grown into the world-wide fraternal organisation representing the Reformed Christian faith.

BY JAMES MILLS

Arriving at Dan Winters’ cottage, students were greeted by Mrs Hilda Winters, ancestor of the famous Dan Winters, who gave a quick tour of the cottage, followed by a history of the Winters Family.  After this, guest speaker Nigel Lutton, a historian, gave a detailed account of the Orange Institution from its origins in 1795 through to the present day, and how it has grown into an international organisation, with lodges in Africa, Australia and the USA. The institution was born at Dan Winters’ cottage after the Battle of the Diamond in 1795 with the order being formally created in Sloan’s inn in Loughgall soon afterwards.  Lutton also gave an interesting talk on the Plantation of Ireland, the 1641 Rebellion, Glorious Revolution 1688, 1798 United Irishmen’s Rebellion right through to the 1912 Home Rule Crisis and a modern history of the Portadown/Loughall area.  A brief question and answer session followed and a certificate commemorating the visit of the society was presented to Mrs Hilda Winters by society Chairman James Mills.  A certificate was also presented by the Winters Family to the Chairman of the society, to be displayed in the Students’ Union building.

The Orange society at the Queen’s University of Belfast was established as a meeting point for all students regardless of community background to learn more about the Orange tradition.  Holding regular meetings in the Students’ Union, the society strives to engage members and guests alike in debates regarding the history, culture, philosophy and theological outlook of Orangeism. It also assesses the role of the Orange Institution in today’s world.  Having a broad membership recruited from within the student body, the Orange Society enjoys engagement with other organisations across the Queen’s campus.

Keen to expound and explain the Orange point of view and history, the Orange Society issued an open invitation to all Students’ representative Councillors and Sabbatical Union Officers to attend the Dan Winters Project.  Many accepted, and the society was very pleased to have Nathan Anderson, newly elected Vice-President for Education join the historical tour.  The Queen’s Annual fund sponsored trip gave many members and guests of the Orange Society a first opportunity to visit this recognised heritage site, and hear about a turbulent but formative time in British and Irish history.

Anyone interested in learning more about the Orange Tradition or the activities of the Orange Society at the Queen’s University should contact quborangesociety@hotmail.co.uk or visit the website at http://orange.society.qub.ac.uk/

BY BEN FINCH

It has been adapted by David Johnston and directed by Dan Gordon, who were responsible for the Lyric’s final play, The Hypochondriact (also by Molière), before work started on the renovations and which gained rave reviews for its Belfast in-jokes. The Miser also stars Andy Gray, from Rab C Nesbitt, in the lead role of Harpingon. Gilly Campbell, from the Arts Council for Northern Ireland, has described the play as a “dynamic performance”, and it has also been called “a spiral of outrageous, comic confusion”. With the Lyric’s excellent reputation for productions and its successful season at Elmwood coming to an end, this is sure to be a hilarious event in the theatre calendar.

The Miser by Molière will run at the Elmwood Hall between Friday 30 April and Saturday 29 May 2010, before touring the North and South of Ireland from 31 May to 9 July 2010. To get tickets call the Box Office on 028 9038 5673 or book online at www.lyrictheatre.co.uk/booktickets.